Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851937›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Role of Age, Comorbidity, and Frailty in the Prediction of Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the Development of a Nomogram.

Giovanni Delli Carpini, Francesco Sopracordevole, Camilla Cicoli, Marco Bernardi, Lucia Giuliani, Mariasole Fichera, Nicolò Clemente, Anna Del Fabro, Jacopo Di Giuseppe, Luca Giannella and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giovanni Delli CarpiniGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Francesco SopracordevoleGynecological Oncology Unit, IRCCS CRO, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, National Cancer Institute, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
Camilla CicoliGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Marco BernardiGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Lucia GiulianiGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Mariasole FicheraGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Nicolò ClementeGynecological Oncology Unit, IRCCS CRO, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, National Cancer Institute, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2748-3041
Anna Del FabroGynecological Oncology Unit, IRCCS CRO, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, National Cancer Institute, 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-7705
Jacopo Di GiuseppeGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6162-6299
Luca GiannellaGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-8522
Enrico BusatoDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Treviso Regional Hospital, AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-2326
Andrea CiavattiniGynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-4947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery is the cornerstone of vulvar cancer treatment, but it is associated with a significant risk of complications that may impact prognosis, particularly in older patients with multiple comorbidities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of age, comorbidities, and frailty in predicting postoperative complications after vulvar cancer surgery and to develop a predictive nomogram. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent surgery for vulvar cancer at two Italian institutions from January 2018 to December 2023. A logistic regression model for the rate of Clavien-Dindo 2+ 30-days complications was run, considering the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (AACCI), body mass index (BMI), and frailty as exposures. Lesion characteristics and surgical procedures were considered as confounders. Among the 225 included patients, 50 (22.2%) had a grade 2+ complication. The predictive score of the nomogram ranged from 44 to 140. The AACCI (0-64 points) and BMI (0-100 points) were independently associated with a risk of complications. A nomogram including the AACCI and BMI predicts the risk of complications for patients undergoing surgery for vulvar cancer. The preoperative determination of the risk of complications enables surgical planning and allows a tailored peri- and postoperative management plan.

Indexed as

FrailtyNomogramsPostoperative ComplicationsVulvar NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsComorbidityFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiescomorbidityfrailtypostoperative complicationsprognosissurgeryvulvar neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39851937
PMCPMC11763996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.