ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Relationship Between Participative Decision-Making Within an Organization and Employees' Cognitive Flexibility, Creativity, and Voice Behavior.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological determinants of employee adaptation: a novel and robust learnability quotient-based fuzzy decision framework for organizational learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unpacking flexible work and employee thriving: knowledge-motivation mediation and the boundary role of cognitive flexibility.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Psychological richness can enhance innovative behavior of Chinese college students: the chain mediating role of cognitive flexibility and creative self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Serendipitous sparks: AI information encounter, cognitive flexibility, AI literacy, and university student creativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The existing literature predominantly examines the direct effects of participative decision-making, often overlooking the mechanisms and processes that mediate or moderate its outcomes. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of participative decision-making on employees' cognitive flexibility, creativity, and voice behavior. Specific contradictions and gaps in prior research are highlighted, particularly the limited understanding of how these variables interact. This study is grounded in self-determination theory and incorporates a research model that examines these relationships through the mediating role of cognitive flexibility. Data were collected from 310 employees in South Korean firms and analyzed using structural equation modeling, providing robust empirical evidence. Key findings demonstrate that participative decision-making significantly enhances cognitive flexibility, which, in turn, mediates its impact on creativity and voice behavior. Direct effects were more pronounced for creativity, while cognitive flexibility played a stronger mediating role in fostering voice behavior. These results underscore the theoretical and practical importance of participative decision-making in fostering innovation and adaptability within organizations. Practical implications for managers and policymakers include fostering a participative culture to enhance employee creativity and voice behavior. Finally, this study discusses limitations, such as reliance on self-reported data, and provides directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.