Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851845›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analyzing Antecedent Configurations of Group Emotion Generation in Public Emergencies: A Multi-Factor Coupling Approach.

Xiaohan Yan, Yi Liu, Yan Chen, Tiezhong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaohan YanSchool of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China.
Yi LiuSchool of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China.
Yan ChenSchool of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China.
Tiezhong LiuSchool of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2755-6960

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China 21BGL299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance emergency management and public opinion governance, improve the accuracy of forecasting group emotional responses, and elucidate the complex pathways of multi-factor coupling in the formation of group emotions, this study constructs a theoretical framework grounded in the social combustion theory. Through web scraping and text sentiment analysis, group emotional tendencies were measured in 40 public emergency cases from the past five years. Using the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method, the study explored the coupling, configuration effect, and formation pathways of factors such as "burning substance", "accelerant", and "ignition" in the emergence of group emotions. The results reveal significant differences in the generation pathways of positive versus negative group emotion. Inter-group threat as a "burning substance" is more likely to trigger negative group emotion, while "accelerant" plays a pivotal role in shaping and guiding emotional responses. Notably, the government's response speed is critical for fostering positive emotions, whereas the emergence of rumors significantly contributes to the spread of negative group emotions. Additionally, the occurrence of stimulating events markedly increases the generation of negative group emotions. This study provides an important theoretical foundation and practical insights for the management and regulation of group emotions.

Indexed as

fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysisgeneration pathwaysgroup emotionmulti-factor couplingsocial combustion theory

Identifiers

PMID39851845
PMCPMC11762103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.