ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cognitive and Neural Differences in Exact and Approximate Arithmetic Using the Production Paradigm: An fNIRS Study.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the cognitive and neural mechanisms of exact and approximate arithmetic using fNIRS technology during natural calculation processes (i.e., the production paradigm). Behavioral results showed (1) a significantly longer reaction time for exact arithmetic compared to approximate arithmetic, and (2) both exact and approximate arithmetic exhibited a problem size effect, with larger operands requiring more time. The fNIRS results further revealed differences in the neural bases underlying these two arithmetic processes, with exact arithmetic showing greater activation in the L-SFG (left superior frontal gyrus, CH16), while approximate arithmetic exhibited problem size effect in the right hemisphere. Additionally, larger operands registered more brain activities in the R-DLPFC (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, CH4), R-SFG (right superior frontal gyrus, CH2), and PMC and SMA (pre- and supplementary motor cortexes, CH3) compared to smaller operands in approximate arithmetic. Moreover, correlation analysis found a significant correlation between approximate arithmetic and semantic processing in the R-PMC and R-SMA (right pre- and supplementary motor cortexes). These findings suggest a neural dissociation between exact and approximate arithmetic, with exact arithmetic processing showing a dominant role in the left hemisphere, while approximate arithmetic processing was more sensitive in the right hemisphere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.