Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851834›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Musical Pitch Perception and Categorization in Listeners with No Musical Training Experience: Insights from Mandarin-Speaking Non-Musicians.

Jie Liang, Fen Zhang, Wenshu Liu, Zilong Li, Keke Yu, Yi Ding, Ruiming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie LiangSchool of Music, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4017-761X
Fen ZhangLIBIS, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7135-3960
Wenshu LiuPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents, Ministry of Education, & Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7753-2251
Zilong LiPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents, Ministry of Education, & Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2853-531X
Keke YuPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents, Ministry of Education, & Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8210-0974
Yi DingSchool of Music, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Ruiming WangPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents, Ministry of Education, & Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3277-0953

Funding

Guangdong Province General University Youth Innovative Talent Project 2022WQNCX016National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371114National Social Science Fund of China 23CYY049Youth Fund Project of Ministry of Education of China on Humanities and Social Sciences Researches 22YJC190027Youth Project of Guangdong Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project GD22YXL02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitch is a fundamental element in music. While most previous studies on musical pitch have focused on musicians, our understanding of musical pitch perception in non-musicians is still limited. This study aimed to explore how Mandarin-speaking listeners who did not receive musical training perceive and categorize musical pitch. Two experiments were conducted in the study. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to discriminate musical tone pairs with different intervals. The results showed that the nearer apart the tones were, the more difficult it was to distinguish. Among adjacent note pairs at major 2nd pitch distance, the A4-B4 pair was perceived as the easiest to differentiate, while the C4-D4 pair was found to be the most difficult. In Experiment 2, participants completed a tone discrimination and identification task with the C4-D4 and A4-B4 musical tone continua as stimuli. The results revealed that the C4-D4 tone continuum elicited stronger categorical perception than the A4-B4 continuum, although the C4-D4 pair was previously found to be more difficult to distinguish in Experiment 1, suggesting a complex interaction between pitch perception and categorization processing. Together, these two experiments revealed the cognitive mechanism underlying musical pitch perception in ordinary populations and provided insights into future musical pitch training strategies.

Indexed as

categorical perceptionmusical pitchpitch discriminationpitch perception

Identifiers

PMID39851834
PMCPMC11762172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.