Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851794›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2025

Comparing International Guidelines for the Remission of Hypertension After Bariatric Surgery.

Carina Vieira Dias, Ana Lúcia Silva, Joana Dias, Paulo Cardoso, Rute Castanheira, Andreia Fernandes, Filipa Nunes, Tina Sanai, Mercedes Sanchez, João Maia-Teixeira and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carina Vieira DiasEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Algarve (ESSUAlg), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Ana Lúcia SilvaInsight: Piaget Research Center for Ecological Human Development, Instituto Piaget, Av. João Paulo II, 1950-157 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-0814
Joana DiasEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Algarve (ESSUAlg), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Paulo CardosoFaculdade de Medicina e Ciências Biomédicas (FMCB), Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Rute CastanheiraFaculdade de Medicina e Ciências Biomédicas (FMCB), Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Andreia FernandesUnidade Local de Saúde do Algarve (ULSALG), Unidade de Faro, Serviço de Cirurgia, Rua Leão Penedo, 8000-286 Faro, Portugal.
Filipa NunesUnidade Local de Saúde do Algarve (ULSALG), Unidade de Faro, Serviço de Cirurgia, Rua Leão Penedo, 8000-286 Faro, Portugal.
Tina SanaiUnidade Local de Saúde do Algarve (ULSALG), Unidade de Faro, Serviço de Cirurgia, Rua Leão Penedo, 8000-286 Faro, Portugal.
Mercedes SanchezUnidade Local de Saúde do Algarve (ULSALG), Unidade de Faro, Serviço de Cirurgia, Rua Leão Penedo, 8000-286 Faro, Portugal.
João Maia-TeixeiraUnidade Local de Saúde do Algarve (ULSALG), Unidade de Faro, Serviço de Cirurgia, Rua Leão Penedo, 8000-286 Faro, Portugal.
Ana Luísa De Sousa-CoelhoEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Algarve (ESSUAlg), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-4302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesObesity remains a global health concern and is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease overall. Dissimilar hypertension guidelines are available for clinicians, namely those prepared by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), which may lead to distinctive appreciation of health outcomes of patients with obesity after bariatric and metabolic surgery, such as hypertension remission. The main goal of this study was to compare the effects of applying stricter (AHA) versus looser (ESC) blood pressure criteria on hypertension diagnosis pre-bariatric surgery and remission assessment one year post-op.

methodsA retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients who underwent surgical treatment for obesity at a single university hospital was performed. To evaluate the hypertension improvement or remission, two different types of blood pressure (BP) categorization were considered (based on AHA and ESC guidelines), in which each patient would fit according to their BP values pre- (m0) and 12 months postoperative (m12).

resultsFrom a sample of 153 patients submitted for surgical treatment of obesity, more patients were considered with hypertension based on the AHA guideline (130 vs. 102;

conclusionsWe conclude that only minor differences exist between the two guidelines used. If evaluated based on ESC guidelines, it is expected that less patients are considered with hypertension, and the remission rate may be, at least numerically, higher.

Indexed as

bariatric surgeryguidelineshypertensionmetabolic surgeryobesityremission

Identifiers

PMID39851794
PMCPMC11763515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.