ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparing Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Time Series Forecasting in Data-Driven Logistics-A Simulation Study.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TF-STNet: A Time-Frequency Dual-Branch Spatiotemporal Network for NWP-to-Station Bias Correction.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tuning Deep Learning for Predicting Aluminum Prices Under Different Sampling: Bayesian Optimization Versus Random Search.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many planning and decision activities in logistics and supply chain management are based on forecasts of multiple time dependent factors. Therefore, the quality of planning depends on the quality of the forecasts. We compare different state-of-the-art forecasting methods in terms of forecasting performance. Differently from most existing research in logistics, we do not perform this in a case-dependent way but consider a broad set of simulated time series to give more general recommendations. We therefore simulate various linear and nonlinear time series that reflect different situations. Our simulation results showed that the machine learning methods, especially Random Forests, performed particularly well in complex scenarios, with the differentiated time series training significantly improving the robustness of the model. In addition, the time series approaches proved to be competitive in low noise scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.