Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851469›Full record

ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Vasopressors for the Prevention of Peri-Intubation Hypotension.

Hollie Saunders, Subekshya Khadka, Rabi Shrestha, Hassan Z Baig, Scott A Helgeson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of propofol aloneWorld journal of methodology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Pharmacology of Physiologically Difficult Airway Management and Impact on Hemodynamics: A Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hollie SaundersDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-1108
Subekshya KhadkaDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Rabi ShresthaDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Hassan Z BaigDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4780-3981
Scott A HelgesonDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7590-2293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPeri-intubation hypotension is a known complication of endotracheal intubation. In the hospital setting, peri-intubation hypotension has been shown to increase hospital mortality and length of stay. The use of prophylactic vasopressors at the time of sedation induction to prevent peri-intubation hypotension has been raised. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the safety and efficacy of this practice.

methodsThe study was fully registered with PROSPERO on 13 October 2022, and screening for eligibility was initiated on 20 September 2024. Randomized controlled trials, along with retrospective or prospective cohort studies, were included in the search. The terms "peri-intubation hypotension", "vasopressors", "intubation", and "anesthesia induced hypotension" were used to search the title/summary in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. An assessment of bias for each study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The primary outcome was the rate of hypotension peri-intubation. Any complications secondary to hypotension or vasopressors were the secondary outcome.

resultsWe identified 13 studies, which were all randomized controlled studies, to include in the final analysis. The risk ratio for preventing peri-intubation hypotension was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2-2.14) with the use of prophylactic phenylephrine while giving propofol versus no prophylactic vasopressors and 1.28 (95% CI 1.03-1.60) with the use of ephedrine.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that in patients undergoing intubation in the operating room with propofol, prophylactic vasopressors given with induction for intubation decrease the odds of hypotension.

Indexed as

hypotensionintubationvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID39851469
PMCPMC11764260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.