Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851355›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Automated Audit and Self-Correction Algorithm for Seg-Hallucination Using MeshCNN-Based On-Demand Generative AI.

Sihwan Kim, Changmin Park, Gwanghyeon Jeon, Seohee Kim, Jong Hyo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sihwan KimDepartment of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9444-0303
Changmin ParkDepartment of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Gwanghyeon JeonClariPi Research, ClariPi Inc., Seoul 03088, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-1900-5026
Seohee KimDepartment of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-0209-5022
Jong Hyo KimDepartment of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5695-4976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly improved medical image segmentation. However, the generalization performance and potential risks of data-driven models remain insufficiently validated. Specifically, unrealistic segmentation predictions deviating from actual anatomical structures, known as a Seg-Hallucination, often occur in deep learning-based models. The Seg-Hallucinations can result in erroneous quantitative analyses and distort critical imaging biomarker information, yet effective audits or corrections to address these issues are rare. Therefore, we propose an automated Seg-Hallucination surveillance and correction (ASHSC) algorithm utilizing only 3D organ mask information derived from CT images without reliance on the ground truth. Two publicly available datasets were used in developing the ASHSC algorithm: 280 CT scans from the TotalSegmentator dataset for training and 274 CT scans from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) dataset for performance evaluation. The ASHSC algorithm utilizes a two-stage on-demand strategy with mesh-based convolutional neural networks and generative artificial intelligence. The segmentation quality level (SQ-level)-based surveillance stage was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. The on-demand correction performance of the algorithm was assessed using similarity metrics: volumetric Dice score, volume error percentage, average surface distance, and Hausdorff distance. Average performance of the surveillance stage resulted in an AUROC of 0.94 ± 0.01, sensitivity of 0.82 ± 0.03, specificity of 0.90 ± 0.01, and PPV of 0.92 ± 0.01 for test dataset. After the on-demand refinement of the correction stage, all the four similarity metrics were improved compared to a single use of the AI-segmentation model. This study not only enhances the efficiency and reliability of handling the Seg-Hallucination but also eliminates the reliance on ground truth. The ASHSC algorithm offers intuitive 3D guidance for uncertainty regions, while maintaining manageable computational complexity. The SQ-level-based on-demand correction strategy adaptively minimizes uncertainties inherent in deep-learning-based organ masks and advances automated auditing and correction methodologies.

Indexed as

AI auditanomaly screeningSeg-Hallucinationsegmentationuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39851355
PMCPMC11763196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.