ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated Audit and Self-Correction Algorithm for Seg-Hallucination Using MeshCNN-Based On-Demand Generative AI.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly improved medical image segmentation. However, the generalization performance and potential risks of data-driven models remain insufficiently validated. Specifically, unrealistic segmentation predictions deviating from actual anatomical structures, known as a Seg-Hallucination, often occur in deep learning-based models. The Seg-Hallucinations can result in erroneous quantitative analyses and distort critical imaging biomarker information, yet effective audits or corrections to address these issues are rare. Therefore, we propose an automated Seg-Hallucination surveillance and correction (ASHSC) algorithm utilizing only 3D organ mask information derived from CT images without reliance on the ground truth. Two publicly available datasets were used in developing the ASHSC algorithm: 280 CT scans from the TotalSegmentator dataset for training and 274 CT scans from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) dataset for performance evaluation. The ASHSC algorithm utilizes a two-stage on-demand strategy with mesh-based convolutional neural networks and generative artificial intelligence. The segmentation quality level (SQ-level)-based surveillance stage was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. The on-demand correction performance of the algorithm was assessed using similarity metrics: volumetric Dice score, volume error percentage, average surface distance, and Hausdorff distance. Average performance of the surveillance stage resulted in an AUROC of 0.94 ± 0.01, sensitivity of 0.82 ± 0.03, specificity of 0.90 ± 0.01, and PPV of 0.92 ± 0.01 for test dataset. After the on-demand refinement of the correction stage, all the four similarity metrics were improved compared to a single use of the AI-segmentation model. This study not only enhances the efficiency and reliability of handling the Seg-Hallucination but also eliminates the reliance on ground truth. The ASHSC algorithm offers intuitive 3D guidance for uncertainty regions, while maintaining manageable computational complexity. The SQ-level-based on-demand correction strategy adaptively minimizes uncertainties inherent in deep-learning-based organ masks and advances automated auditing and correction methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.