ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Can CT Image Reconstruction Parameters Impact the Predictive Value of Radiomics Features in Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence versus conventional imaging for differentiating G2/G3 from G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- From diagnosis to treatment: navigating the course for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The WHO grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) is essential in patient management and an independent prognostic factor for patient survival. Radiomics features from CE-CT images hold promise for the outcome and tumor grade prediction. However, variations in reconstruction parameters can impact the predictive value of radiomics. 127 patients with histopathologically confirmed PanNENs underwent CT scans with filtered back projection (B20f) and iterative (I26f) reconstruction kernels. 3190 radiomic features were extracted from tumors and pancreatic volumes. Wilcoxon paired tests assessed the impact of reconstruction kernels and ComBat harmonization efficiency. SVM models were employed to predict tumor grade using the entire set of radiomics features or only those identified as harmonizable. The models' performance was assessed on an independent dataset of 36 patients. Significant differences, after correction for multiple testing, were observed in 69% of features in the pancreatic volume and 51% in the tumor volume with B20f and I26f kernels. SVM models demonstrated accuracy ranging from 0.67 (95%CI: 0.50-0.81) to 0.83 (95%CI: 0.69-0.94) in distinguishing grade 1 cases from higher grades. Reconstruction kernels alter radiomics features and iterative kernel models trended towards higher performance. ComBat harmonization mitigates kernel impacts but addressing this effect is crucial in studies involving data from different kernels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.