Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851320›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Polycaprolactone for Hard Tissue Regeneration: Scaffold Design and In Vivo Implications.

Fernanda Ramírez-Ruiz, Israel Núñez-Tapia, María Cristina Piña-Barba, Marco Antonio Alvarez-Pérez, Vincenzo Guarino, Janeth Serrano-Bello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structure-Function Interplay in Piezoelectric PCL/BaTiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernanda Ramírez-RuizTissue Bioengineering Laboratory, Division of Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, University City, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0009-0910-562X
Israel Núñez-TapiaMaterials Research Institute, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, University City, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0733-9368
María Cristina Piña-BarbaMaterials Research Institute, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, University City, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0589-0500
Marco Antonio Alvarez-PérezTissue Bioengineering Laboratory, Division of Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, University City, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Vincenzo GuarinoInstitute of Polymers, Composite and Biomaterials, National Research Council of Italy, Mostra d'Oltremare, Pad 20, V.le J.F.Kennedy 54, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-3721
Janeth Serrano-BelloTissue Bioengineering Laboratory, Division of Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, University City, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-9575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last thirty years, tissue engineering (TI) has emerged as an alternative method to regenerate tissues and organs and restore their function by implanting specific lineage cells, growth factors, or biomolecules functionalizing a matrix scaffold. Recently, several pathologies have led to bone loss or damage, such as malformations, bone resorption associated with benign or malignant tumors, periodontal disease, traumas, and others in which a discontinuity in tissue integrity is observed. Bone tissue is characterized by different stiffness, mechanical traction, and compression resistance as a function of the different compartments, which can influence susceptibility to injury or destruction. For this reason, research into repairing bone defects began several years ago to find a scaffold to improve bone regeneration. Different techniques can be used to manufacture 3D scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration based on optimizing reproducible scaffolds with a controlled hierarchical porous structure like the extracellular matrix of bone. Additionally, the scaffolds synthesized can facilitate the inclusion of bone or mesenchymal stem cells with growth factors that improve bone osteogenesis, recruiting new cells for the neighborhood to generate an optimal environment for tissue regeneration. In this review, current state-of-the-art scaffold manufacturing based on the use of polycaprolactone (PCL) as a biomaterial for bone tissue regeneration will be described by reporting relevant studies focusing on processing techniques, from traditional-i.e., freeze casting, thermally induced phase separation, gas foaming, solvent casting, and particle leaching-to more recent approaches, such as 3D additive manufacturing (i.e., 3D printing/bioprinting, electrofluid dynamics/electrospinning), as well as integrated techniques. As a function of the used technique, this work aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the benefits/limitations of PCL-based scaffolds in order to establish a relationship between scaffold composition, namely integration of other biomaterial phases' structural properties (i.e., pore morphology and mechanical properties) and in vivo response.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbone tissuePCL in vivo implicationspolycaprolactonescaffoldssynthetic polymertissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39851320
PMCPMC11759179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.