ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Method for Pectoral Muscle Segmentation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Nipple Segmentation in Digital Mammography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The consistency regularization method is a widely used semi-supervised method that uses regularization terms constructed from unlabeled data to improve model performance. Poor-quality target predictions in regularization terms produce noisy gradient flows during training, resulting in a degradation in model performance. Recent semi-supervised methods usually filter out low-confidence target predictions to alleviate this problem, but also prevent the model from learning features from unlabeled data in low-confidence regions. Specifically, in medical imaging and other cross-domain scenarios, models are prone to producing large numbers of low-confidence predictions. To improve the quality of target predictions while utilizing unlabeled data more efficiently, we propose an uncertainty-aware semi-supervised method that incorporates the breast anatomical prior, for pectoral muscle segmentation. Our method has a typical teacher-student dual model structure, where uncertainty is used to distinguish between high- and low-confidence predictions in the teacher model output. A low-confidence prediction refinement module was designed to refine the low-confidence predictions by incorporating high-confidence predictions and a learned anatomical prior. The anatomical prior, as regularization of the target predictions, was learned from annotations and an auxiliary task. The final target predictions are a combination of high-confidence teacher predictions and refined low-confidence predictions. The proposed method was evaluated on a dataset containing 635 data points from three data centers. Compared with the baseline method, the proposed method showed an average improvement in DICE index of 1.76, an average reduction in IoU index of 3.21, and an average reduction in HD index of 5.48. The experimental results show that our method generalizes well to the test set and outperforms other methods in all evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.