Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851310›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Method for Pectoral Muscle Segmentation.

Yutao Tang, Yongze Guo, Huayu Wang, Ting Song, Yao Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yutao TangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun-Yat sen University, Guanghzou 510006, China.
Yongze GuoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun-Yat sen University, Guanghzou 510006, China.
Huayu WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun-Yat sen University, Guanghzou 510006, China.
Ting SongThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guanghzou 510150, China.
Yao LuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun-Yat sen University, Guanghzou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-9569

Funding

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Computational Science at Sun Yat-sen University Grant 2020B1212060032NSFC Grant 12126610, Grant 81971691, Grant 81801809, Grant 81830052, Grant 81827802, and Grant U1811461,the Construction Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging Grant 18DZ2260400the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province Grant 20190302108GXthe Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province Grant 2021B0101190003.the Science and Technology Innovative Project of Guangdong Province Grant 2018B030312002the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou Grant 201804020053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consistency regularization method is a widely used semi-supervised method that uses regularization terms constructed from unlabeled data to improve model performance. Poor-quality target predictions in regularization terms produce noisy gradient flows during training, resulting in a degradation in model performance. Recent semi-supervised methods usually filter out low-confidence target predictions to alleviate this problem, but also prevent the model from learning features from unlabeled data in low-confidence regions. Specifically, in medical imaging and other cross-domain scenarios, models are prone to producing large numbers of low-confidence predictions. To improve the quality of target predictions while utilizing unlabeled data more efficiently, we propose an uncertainty-aware semi-supervised method that incorporates the breast anatomical prior, for pectoral muscle segmentation. Our method has a typical teacher-student dual model structure, where uncertainty is used to distinguish between high- and low-confidence predictions in the teacher model output. A low-confidence prediction refinement module was designed to refine the low-confidence predictions by incorporating high-confidence predictions and a learned anatomical prior. The anatomical prior, as regularization of the target predictions, was learned from annotations and an auxiliary task. The final target predictions are a combination of high-confidence teacher predictions and refined low-confidence predictions. The proposed method was evaluated on a dataset containing 635 data points from three data centers. Compared with the baseline method, the proposed method showed an average improvement in DICE index of 1.76, an average reduction in IoU index of 3.21, and an average reduction in HD index of 5.48. The experimental results show that our method generalizes well to the test set and outperforms other methods in all evaluation metrics.

Indexed as

deep learningsegmentationuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39851310
PMCPMC11762713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.