ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Cells Grouping Detection and Confusing Labels Correction on Cervical Pathology Images.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metrics.Frontiers in big data · 2025Pooled it
- The Potential of Menstrual Blood-Derived Extracellular Vesicles (MenMSC-Evs) in Combination with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) as a Biological Adjuvant for Improving Full-Thickness Wound Healing.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- AI in Cervical Cancer Cytology Diagnostics: A Narrative Review of Cutting-Edge Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers among women, posing a significant threat to their health. Early screening can detect cervical precancerous lesions in a timely manner, thereby enabling the prevention or treatment of the disease. The use of pathological image analysis technology to automatically interpret cells in pathological slices is a hot topic in digital medicine research, as it can reduce the substantial effort required from pathologists to identify cells and can improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. Therefore, we propose a cervical cell detection network based on collecting prior knowledge and correcting confusing labels, called PGCC-Net. Specifically, we utilize clinical prior knowledge to break down the detection task into multiple sub-tasks for cell grouping detection, aiming to more effectively learn the specific structure of cells. Subsequently, we merge region proposals from grouping detection to achieve refined detection. In addition, according to the Bethesda system, clinical definitions among various categories of abnormal cervical cells are complex, and their boundaries are ambiguous. Differences in assessment criteria among pathologists result in ambiguously labeled cells, which poses a significant challenge for deep learning networks. To address this issue, we perform a labels correction module with feature similarity by constructing feature centers for typical cells in each category. Then, cells that are easily confused are mapped with these feature centers in order to update cells' annotations. Accurate cell labeling greatly aids the classification head of the detection network. We conducted experimental validation on a public dataset of 7410 images and a private dataset of 13,526 images. The results indicate that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art cervical cell detection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.