ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
External Validation of Deep Learning Models for Classifying Etiology of Retinal Hemorrhage Using Diverse Fundus Photography Datasets.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite element analysis of asymmetrical retinal hemorrhages in shaken baby syndrome.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Article
- Utilizing Detectron2 for accurate and efficient colon cancer detection in histopathological images.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal hemorrhage (RH) is a significant clinical finding with various etiologies, necessitating accurate classification for effective management. This study aims to externally validate deep learning (DL) models, specifically FastVit_SA12 and ResNet18, for distinguishing between traumatic and medical causes of RH using diverse fundus photography datasets. A comprehensive dataset was compiled, including private collections from South Korea and Virginia, alongside publicly available datasets such as RFMiD, BRSET, and DeepEyeNet. The models were evaluated on a total of 2661 images, achieving high performance metrics. FastVit_SA12 demonstrated an overall accuracy of 96.99%, with a precision of 0.9935 and recall of 0.9723 for medical cases, while ResNet18 achieved a 94.66% accuracy with a precision of 0.9893. A Grad-CAM analysis revealed that ResNet18 emphasized global vascular patterns, such as arcuate vessels, while FastVit_SA12 focused on clinically relevant areas, including the optic disk and hemorrhagic regions. Medical cases showed localized activations, whereas trauma-related images displayed diffuse patterns across the fundus. Both models exhibited strong sensitivity and specificity, indicating their potential utility in clinical settings for accurate RH diagnosis. This study underscores the importance of external validation in enhancing the reliability and applicability of AI models in ophthalmology, paving the way for improved patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.