ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
HDNLS: Hybrid Deep-Learning and Non-Linear Least Squares-Based Method for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Mapping in the Knee Joint.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-efficient hybrid parameter scaling for accurate microbial bioreactor scale-up.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- HSGDNet: Hybrid Synthetic-Data-Guided Deep Learning With NLS Refinement for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Knee Mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-linear least squares (NLS) methods are commonly used for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially for multi-exponential T1ρ mapping, which provides precise parameter estimation for different relaxation models in tissues, such as mono-exponential (ME), bi-exponential (BE), and stretched-exponential (SE) models. However, NLS may suffer from problems like sensitivity to initial guesses, slow convergence speed, and high computational cost. While deep learning (DL)-based T1ρ fitting methods offer faster alternatives, they often face challenges such as noise sensitivity and reliance on NLS-generated reference data for training. To address these limitations of both approaches, we propose the HDNLS, a hybrid model for fast multi-component parameter mapping, particularly targeted for T1ρ mapping in the knee joint. HDNLS combines voxel-wise DL, trained with synthetic data, with a few iterations of NLS to accelerate the fitting process, thus eliminating the need for reference MRI data for training. Due to the inverse-problem nature of the parameter mapping, certain parameters in a specific model may be more sensitive to noise, such as the short component in the BE model. To address this, the number of NLS iterations in HDNLS can act as a regularization, stabilizing the estimation to obtain meaningful solutions. Thus, in this work, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of NLS iterations on HDNLS performance and proposed four variants that balance estimation accuracy and computational speed. These variants are Ultrafast-NLS, Superfast-HDNLS, HDNLS, and Relaxed-HDNLS. These methods allow users to select a suitable configuration based on their specific speed and performance requirements. Among these, HDNLS emerges as the optimal trade-off between performance and fitting time. Extensive experiments on synthetic data demonstrate that HDNLS achieves comparable performance to NLS and regularized-NLS (RNLS) with a minimum of a 13-fold improvement in speed. HDNLS is just a little slower than DL-based methods; however, it significantly improves estimation quality, offering a solution for T1ρ fitting that is fast and reliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.