Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851266›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2025

The role of germline and somatic mutations in predicting cancer-associated thrombosis: a narrative review.

Vincent Lanting, Merel Oskam, Hanneke Wilmink, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Nick van Es

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent LantingAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam.
Merel OskamAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam.
Hanneke WilminkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, department of Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter W KamphuisenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam.
Nick van EsAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPatients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines suggest to use risk assessment tools to guide decisions about thromboprophylaxis, but current tools have modest discriminatory ability. Genetic information from the germline or tumor has the potential to improve VTE prediction. Here, we provide a clinical overview of the current role of genetics in cancer-associated VTE. RECENT

findingsGermline mutations, such as factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A, are associated with a 2- to 2.5-fold increased VTE risk in patients with cancer. Tumor-specific somatic mutations also contribute to VTE risk, such as ALK rearrangements increasing the risk in nonsmall cell lung cancer and IDH1 mutations decreasing the risk in gliomas. Other somatic mutations associated with VTE independent of tumor type include KRAS , STK11 , MET , KEAP1 , CTNNB1 , and CDKN2B . Incorporating data on germline or somatic mutations in risk scores improves discriminatory ability compared with the Khorana score. SUMMARY: Specific germline and somatic mutations are associated with an increased VTE risk in patients with cancer and potentially improve performance of clinical risk scores. The increasing and widespread use of genetic testing in cancer care provides an opportunity for further development of prediction models incorporating genetic predictors.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationMutationNeoplasmsThrombosisVenous ThromboembolismGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39851266
PMCPMC11957438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.