Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851264›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

Public Health Travel Restrictions Implemented for Persons at Risk of Transmitting SARS-CoV-2 Infection-United States, January 1, 2020-April 6, 2022.

Amethyst Clare A Surpris, M Robynne Jungerman, Leigh Ellyn Preston, Alida M Gertz, Krista K Duong, Sheila Roy, Mayra Morales, John Olmstead, Kristin Delea, Francisco Alvarado-Ramy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amethyst Clare A SurprisAuthor Affiliations: Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Ms Surpris, Ms Jungerman, Dr Preston, Dr Gertz, Ms Duong, Dr Roy, Ms Morales, Mr Olmstead, Ms Delea, Dr Alvarado-Ramy, Dr Brown, and Dr Chen); Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologist (CSTE) Fellow, Atlanta, Georgia (Mr Olmstead); and University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida (Ms Surpris).
M Robynne Jungerman
Leigh Ellyn Preston
Alida M Gertz
Krista K Duong
Sheila Roy
Mayra Morales
John Olmstead
Kristin Delea
Francisco Alvarado-Ramy
Clive Brown
Tai-Ho Chen

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFederal public health travel restrictions (FPHTR) in the United States are implemented for persons who meet specific criteria to prevent spread of communicable diseases of public health concern. FPHTR can mitigate the risk of disease transmission during air travel and mitigating disease translocation between geographic areas.

objectiveTo characterize and determine the extent of FPHTR implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designSecondary data analysis. SETTING AND

participantsThis report reviewed the U.S. public health response for 3010 persons traveling within, into, and out of, the U.S. who were placed on federal public health travel restrictions during the COVID-19 outbreak from January 1, 2020 to April 6, 2022.

main outcome measureTotal number and characteristics of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection or high-risk exposure added to FPHTR.

resultsDuring this period, FPHTR were implemented for 3010/5460 (55%) persons who were reported to CDC as having tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, or being identified as close contacts of a person with COVID-19, with intention to travel. Of those added to FPHTR lists, 2023/3010 (67%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 975/3010 (32%) were close contacts, and 12/3010 (0.4%) were reasonably believed to have COVID-19 but later confirmed to have another diagnosis and removed. Twenty-six percent (793/3010) of SARS-CoV-2-related FPHTR were for persons reported to CDC after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 at a testing site located within a U.S. airport.

conclusionsThe extensive application of FPHTR for more than 3000 persons over a period of 29 months during the COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented. The additional use of FPHTR required extraordinary effort and collaboration among CDC staff and local/state public health agencies for case investigation, reporting, exchange of information, and communication with travelers for case management. Use of this tool should be considered within the context current transmission risk and disease severity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthTravelAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID39851264
PMCPMC13543500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.