Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851201›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Estimation of the postoperative fatality window in colorectal cancer surgery.

Martin Rutegård, Peter Matthiessen, Jörgen Rutegård, Markku M Haapamäki, Johan Svensson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin RutegårdDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0974-6373
Peter MatthiessenDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Jörgen RutegårdDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Markku M HaapamäkiDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Johan SvenssonDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden AMP 19-978Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation RV-762241Swedish Society of Medicine SLS-934594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative death measured 30 days after surgery is a conventional quality metric, whereas intervals up to 90 days are increasingly used, although data-driven time windows have scarcely been investigated.

methodsThe Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients subjected resection for colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2020. All patients were followed up until 180 days after surgery. A join-point statistical hazard model was used to model a declining hazard to a transition point, followed by a stable death rate. This method was subsequently applied to describe postoperative deaths for the entire cohort and subgroups according to tumour location (colon and rectum).

resultsSome 56 096 patients electively operated on for colorectal cancer during the study interval were included, with a 30-day and 90-day fatality of 805 (1.43%) and 1458 (2.60%) patients respectively. The derived postoperative fatality window, after which the death rate transitioned to a stable rate, was 23.8 (95% c.i. 21.5 to 28.2) days after surgery. There was no significant difference in the time window between rectal cancer (22.9 days; 95% c.i. 15.1 to 28.4) and colon cancer (27.3 days; 95% c.i. 21.4 to 31.8) patients (P = 0.455). However, postoperative fatality time windows were extended in patients aged at least 80 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists' grade III or IV.

conclusionThe traditional postoperative time window of 30 days was confirmed to be an appropriate metric in elective colorectal cancer surgery when evaluated with a hazards-based statistical framework. Importantly, this time window is influenced by older age and advanced co-morbidity, which could prompt increased vigilance for these patient groups.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesSwedenTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39851201
PMCPMC11758370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.