Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39851188›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2025

Diffusion-weighted imaging to predict longer-term response in Crohn's disease patients commencing biological therapy: results from the MOTILITY trial.

Maira Hameed, Stuart A Taylor, Norin Ahmed, Kashfia Chowdhury, Anisha Patel, Emma Helbren, Anisha Bhagwanani, Rachel Hyland, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Harbir Sidhu and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Maira HameedDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-5695
Stuart A TaylorDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Norin AhmedComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom.
Kashfia ChowdhuryComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom.
Anisha PatelDepartment of Radiology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh EH1 3EG, United Kingdom.
Emma HelbrenDepartment of Radiology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom.
Anisha BhagwananiDepartment of Radiology, Frimley Health NHS Trust, Frimley GU16 7UJ, United Kingdom.
Rachel HylandDepartment of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Gauraang BhatnagarCentre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom.
Harbir SidhuDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Hannah LambieDepartment of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
James FranklinInstitute of Medical Imaging and Visualisation, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH8 8GP, United Kingdom.
Maryam MohsinDepartment of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Elen ThomsonDepartment of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Darren BooneDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Damian TolanDepartment of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Safi RahmanDepartment of Radiology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.
Naomi S SakaiDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Gordon W MoranTranslational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Alisa HartDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London NW10 7NS, United Kingdom.
Stuart BloomDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Alex MenysMotilent, London E1 8FA, United Kingdom.
Ilan JacobsPatient Representative.
Steve HalliganDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Andrew A PlumbDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1322-5113
MOTILITY Trial Investigators

Funding

AstraZenecaDepartment of Health and Social CareEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation NIHR EME 14/201/16National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPredicting longer-term response to biological therapy for small bowel Crohn's disease (SBCD) is an unmet clinical need. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DWI) may indicate disease activity, but its predictive ability, if any, is unknown. We investigated the prognostic value of DWI for 1 year response or remission (RoR) in SBCD patients commencing biologic therapy, including incremental value over C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC).

methodsA subset of participants in a prospective, multicentre study investigating the predictive ability of motility MRI for 1-year RoR in patients starting biologic therapy for active SBCD, underwent additional DWI at baseline and post-induction (12-30 weeks). CRP and FC were collected in a subgroup. RoR at 1 year was evaluated using clinical and morphological MR enterography (MRE) parameters. We calculated sensitivity and specificity to predict RoR and quality of life (QoL) at 1 year, comparing apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, Clermont score, and CRP using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsA total of 25 participants were included (mean 36.9 years, 32% female). ADC changes and Clermont score had poor sensitivity (30.0% [95% CI, 6.7-65.2] and 40.0% [95% CI, 12.2-73.8], respectively) and poor-to-modest specificity (50.0 [95% CI, 27.2-72.8] and 65.0% [95% CI, 40.8-84.6]) for RoR. None of Clermont score, CRP, or FC predicted QoL.

conclusionsDWI has inadequate sensitivity and specificity for RoR at 1 year. There is no significant incremental prognostic value of DWI over CRP and FC to predict RoR and/or QoL at 1 year. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Early post-induction DWI has no prognostic value for RoR at 1 year.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyCrohn DiseaseDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultC-Reactive ProteinFecesFemaleHumansLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSensitivity and SpecificityC-Reactive ProteinLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexbiological therapyCrohn’s diseasediffusion magnetic resonance imagingprognosisquality of life

Identifiers

PMID39851188
PMCPMC11919076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.