ArticleCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2026
Predicting Polymerase Chain Reaction Success: Integrating the
Article in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPolymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) has been a pivotal scientific technique since the twentieth century, and it is widely applied across various domains. Despite its ubiquity, challenges persist in efficiently amplifying specific DNA templates.
methodWhile PCR experimental procedures have garnered significant attention, the analysis of the DNA template, which is the experiment's focal point, has been notably overlooked. This study addresses the uncertainty surrounding the amplification of DNA fragments using conventional Taq DNA polymerase-based PCR protocols. The imperative need to characterize DNA templates and devise a reliable method for predicting PCR success is underscored.
resultIn this study, we formulate a 72-dimensional feature vector representing a DNA template through the utilization of k-word order and modeling of physicochemical properties of double bases. Subsequently, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model is employed to assess PCR results.
conclusionA jackknife cross-validation test is used to evaluate the anticipated success rates, resulting in an overall accuracy of 95.77%. Sensitivity, specificity, and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) stand at 95.75%, 95.79%, and 0.915, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39851098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.