Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850957›Full record

ReviewPravention und Gesundheitsforderung2025

[Suicide prevention for LGBTQ+ youth: necessity, model and approaches].

Andreas Pfister

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andreas PfisterInstitut für Public Health, ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, Postfach, 8401 Winterthur, Schweiz.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-8260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth (LGBTQ+) are at a greater risk of attempting suicide at least once in their lives than their heterosexual and cisgender peers. However, evidence-based suicide prevention approaches and models for LGBTQ+ youth are lacking. Methods: Using German-language and international literature, the background of suicidal behaviour among LGBTQ+ youth was highlighted, gaps were identified and, based on this, a model of intersectional and multisectoral suicide prevention was designed. Results: The few concepts for strengthening mental health and suicide prevention among LGBTQ+ youth stem from social work, clinical psychology and psychiatry/medicine. However, a consistently multisectoral perspective and consideration of the intertwining of further diversity dimensions such as "race", socioeconomic status, etc. with sexual orientation and/or gender identity is lacking in suicide prevention. Based on Russell and Fish's (2016) model, a new conceptual model of suicide prevention for LGBTQ+ youth was designed, and universal, selective and indicated approaches were exemplified. Conclusion: The proposed model provides a new conceptual framework to locate, plan and implement suicide prevention interventions at different levels, intersectionally and across different professions and sectors.

Indexed as

Gender identityIntersectionalityMental healthSexual and gender minority youthSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID39850957
PMCPMC11755836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.