Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850938›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Characterization of saffron from different origins by HS-GC-IMS and authenticity identification combined with deep learning.

Yingjie Lu, Chi Zhang, Kunmiao Feng, Jie Luan, Yuqi Cao, Khalid Rahman, Jianbo Ba, Ting Han, Juan Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yingjie LuSchool of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Chi ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Kunmiao FengSchool of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Jie LuanNaval Medicine Center of PLA, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yuqi CaoTechnical Centre, Shanghai Tobacco (Group) Corp., Shanghai 200082, China.
Khalid RahmanFaculty of Science, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jianbo BaNaval Medicine Center of PLA, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ting HanSchool of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Juan SuSchool of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rising demand of saffron, it is essential to standardize the confirmation of its origin and identify any adulteration to maintain a good quality led market product. However, a rapid and reliable strategy for identifying the adulteration saffron is still lacks. Herein, a combination of headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed. Sixty-nine volatile compounds (VOCs) including 7 groups of isomers were detected rapidly and directly. A CNN prediction model based on GC-IMS data was proposed. With the merit of minimal data prepossessing and automatic feature extraction capability, GC-IMS images were directly input to the CNN model. The origin prediction results were output with the average accuracy about 90 %, which was higher than traditional methods like PCA (61 %) and SVM (71 %). This established CNN also showed ability in identifying counterfeit saffron with a high accuracy of 98 %, which can be used to authenticate saffron.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksHS-GC-IMSOriginsSaffronVolatile components

Identifiers

PMID39850938
PMCPMC11754009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.