Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850936›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Comparative analysis of key aroma compounds in air-frying roasted pork from five species.

Lin Li, Pingping Huang, Rujie Yang, Jingyu Li, Yuping Zhang, Junke Li, Jianjun Li, Jianmei Zhang, Nigel P Brunton, Huan Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lin LiYantai Food and Drug Inspection and Testing Center, Yantai 264035, Shandong, China.
Pingping HuangSchool of Food Engineering, Yantai Key Laboratory of Nanoscience and Technology for Prepared Food, Yantai Engineering Research Center of Green Food Processing and Quality Control, Bionanotechnology Institute, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China.
Rujie YangSchool of Food Engineering, Yantai Key Laboratory of Nanoscience and Technology for Prepared Food, Yantai Engineering Research Center of Green Food Processing and Quality Control, Bionanotechnology Institute, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China.
Jingyu LiSchool of Food Engineering, Yantai Key Laboratory of Nanoscience and Technology for Prepared Food, Yantai Engineering Research Center of Green Food Processing and Quality Control, Bionanotechnology Institute, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China.
Yuping ZhangSchool of Food Engineering, Yantai Key Laboratory of Nanoscience and Technology for Prepared Food, Yantai Engineering Research Center of Green Food Processing and Quality Control, Bionanotechnology Institute, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China.
Junke LiSchool of Food Engineering, Yantai Key Laboratory of Nanoscience and Technology for Prepared Food, Yantai Engineering Research Center of Green Food Processing and Quality Control, Bionanotechnology Institute, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China.
Jianjun LiYantai Xiwang Foods Co., Ltd., Yantai 264025, China.
Jianmei ZhangYantai Xiwang Foods Co., Ltd., Yantai 264025, China.
Nigel P BruntonSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Huan LiuSchool of Food Engineering, Yantai Key Laboratory of Nanoscience and Technology for Prepared Food, Yantai Engineering Research Center of Green Food Processing and Quality Control, Bionanotechnology Institute, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China.
Xiangru WeiSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularity of roasted pork among Chinese consumers is largely attributed to its rich aroma profile. However, the suitability of different pork species for roasting remains uncertain. In this study, the effect of various pork species on the aroma profiles of roasted pork was systematically investigated using gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS). The results indicated that the roasted pork from five different species exhibited rich roasty, meaty, and fatty notes. Fifty-two aroma compounds were identified, with seven key odorants, including pyrazines and aldehydes, being recognized as primary contributors to the aroma. The orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) effectively distinguished the aroma profiles of the five pork species. Twelve aroma compounds displayed variable importance in projection (VIP) scores exceeding 1, with butyrolactone being identified as a potential biomarker. Among the species, Tibetan and Min pigs were found to be the most suitable for roasting, with Min pigs showing particular promise.

Indexed as

Aroma profileBiomarkerGC-O-MSRoasted porkSensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39850936
PMCPMC11754130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.