ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2024
Subtrochanteric Fractures of The Femur: May a Short Nail Be a Reliable Option?
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatGPT in Orthopedic Trauma: Consistency, Accuracy, and Agreement With Textbook and Expert Opinion.Cureus · 2026Article
- The Distribution of Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal (CCD) Angles in the Iranian Elderly Population: Implications for Proximal Femoral Nail Design.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical outcomes of limited open reduction and intramedullary nailing with steel cable cerclage in Seinsheimer III femoral subtrochanteric fractures.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur may be challenging due to their anatomical and biomechanical features. Intramedullary nails are the most frequently used devices, although there is no consensus concerning their optimal length. The aim of this study is to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of the fragility subtrochanteric fractures treated with short versus long cephalomedullary nails. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all over-65-year-old patients that underwent surgery with a cephalomedullary nail between January 2013 to December 2020 due to a subtrochanteric fracture. The primary outcome was the presence of mechanical complications (cut out, cut in, varus consolidation, nonunion and nail breakage). Accuracy of the reduction, distance from the fracture line to most proximal distal screw, operative time and Palmer Mobility score were also analyzed. Results: Ninety-five patients were included. There were not significant differences in complication rate, Parker mobility score nor quality of reduction between both cohorts. Patients with a good radiological reduction presented no complications, those with an acceptable reduction presented a complication rate of 35.5% and it raised to 53.3% in poorly reduced ones (P=0.002). The complication rate was higher in the <5cm distance group (58.33%) than in the >5cm distance group (22.64%) (P=0.014). Conclusion: Anatomical reduction may be the key factor in the management of subtrochanteric fractures, in order to avoid complications. The chosen device working length should also be taken into account to treat these challenging injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.