Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

CAR-T cell therapy: developments, challenges and expanded applications from cancer to autoimmunity.

Yaojie Kong, Jingyao Li, Xueyao Zhao, Yanwei Wu, Liang Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yaojie KongSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Jingyao LiSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Xueyao ZhaoSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Yanwei WuSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Liang ChenSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has rapidly emerged as a groundbreaking approach in cancer treatment, particularly for hematologic malignancies. However, the application of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors remains challenging. This review summarized the development of CAR-T technologies, emphasized the challenges and solutions in CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors. Also, key innovations were discussed including specialized CAR-T, combination therapies and the novel use of CAR-Treg, CAR-NK and CAR-M cells. Besides, CAR-based cell therapy have extended its reach beyond oncology to autoimmune disorders. We reviewed preclinical experiments and clinical trials involving CAR-T, Car-Treg and CAAR-T cell therapies in various autoimmune diseases. By highlighting these cutting-edge developments, this review underscores the transformative potential of CAR technologies in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesAutoimmunityImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigenautoimmune diseasesCAR-T cell therapyCAR-Tregdual-CAR strategysolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID39850899
PMCPMC11754230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.