Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850897›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

Injecting hope: the potential of intratumoral immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic cancer.

Marketa Skalickova, Katerina Hadrava Vanova, Ondrej Uher, Jindriska Leischner Fialova, Katerina Petrlakova, Michal Masarik, Zdeněk Kejík, Pavel Martasek, Karel Pacak, Milan Jakubek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Improved early response assessment of chemoimmunotherapy efficacy byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marketa SkalickovaBIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vestec, Czechia.
Katerina Hadrava VanovaSection on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ondrej UherSection on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jindriska Leischner FialovaBIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vestec, Czechia.
Katerina PetrlakovaDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Michal MasarikBIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vestec, Czechia.
Zdeněk KejíkBIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vestec, Czechia.
Pavel MartasekDepartment of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Karel PacakSection on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Milan JakubekBIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vestec, Czechia.

Funding

Diagnosis &Pathophysiology of PheochromocytomaZ01HD008735 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI PACAK, KAREL · 2001 to 2008
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite enormous progress, advanced cancers are still one of the most serious medical problems in current society. Although various agents and therapeutic strategies with anticancer activity are known and used, they often fail to achieve satisfactory long-term patient outcomes and survival. Recently, immunotherapy has shown success in patients by harnessing important interactions between the immune system and cancer. However, many of these therapies lead to frequent side effects when administered systemically, prompting treatment modifications or discontinuation or, in severe cases, fatalities. New therapeutic approaches like intratumoral immunotherapy, characterized by reduced side effects, cost, and systemic toxicity, offer promising prospects for future applications in clinical oncology. In the context of locally advanced or metastatic cancer, combining diverse immunotherapeutic and other treatment strategies targeting multiple cancer hallmarks appears crucial. Such combination therapies hold promise for improving patient outcomes and survival and for promoting a sustained systemic response. This review aims to provide a current overview of immunotherapeutic approaches, specifically focusing on the intratumoral administration of drugs in patients with locally advanced and metastatic cancers. It also explores the integration of intratumoral administration with other modalities to maximize therapeutic response. Additionally, the review summarizes recent advances in intratumoral immunotherapy and discusses novel therapeutic approaches, outlining future directions in the field.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyHumansInjections, IntralesionalNeoplasm Metastasisadvanced and metastatic cancercancercombination therapyimmunotherapyintratumoral

Identifiers

PMID39850897
PMCPMC11754201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.