Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850887›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Eosinophil is a predictor of severe immune-related adverse events induced by ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Yoshihiko Tasaki, Shuzo Hamamoto, Shimpei Yamashita, Junya Furukawa, Kazutoshi Fujita, Ryotaro Tomida, Makito Miyake, Noriyuki Ito, Hideto Iwamoto, Yoshihisa Mimura and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yoshihiko TasakiDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Shuzo HamamotoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Shimpei YamashitaDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Junya FurukawaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ryotaro TomidaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Noriyuki ItoDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Hideto IwamotoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori, Japan.
Yoshihisa MimuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yosuke SugiyamaDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Rei UnnoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Atsushi OkadaDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yoko Furukawa-HibiDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors are difficult to predict and can lead to severe events. Although it is important to develop strategies for the early detection of severe irAEs, there is a lack of evidence on irAEs associated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between eosinophil and severe irAEs in patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy for RCC. Methods: In this retrospective study, 161 patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy for RCC were divided into three groups based on whether they experienced <grade 2 irAEs (non-severe irAE group), ≥grade 3 irAEs (severe irAE group), or not (non-irAE group). We examined the proportion of eosinophils before and 2 weeks after treatment (baseline and 2-week samples, respectively). Results: Although the eosinophil in the baseline samples did not differ between the severe irAE and non-irAE groups (2.8% vs. 2.5%, Discussion: An increased eosinophil 2 weeks after ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy may be a predictor of severe irAEs, which are associated with poor prognoses, compared with non-severe irAEs among patients with RCC. We provide a novel rationale for the importance of monitoring eosinophil counts for the early detection of severe irAEs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellEosinophilsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabKidney NeoplasmsNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabeosinophilimmune-related adverse eventipilimumabnivolumabrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39850887
PMCPMC11754295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.