Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Combining single-cell analysis and molecular docking techniques to construct a prognostic model for colon adenocarcinoma and uncovering inhibin subunit βb as a novel therapeutic target.

Qinqing Wu, Lu Ye, Yuwei Wu, Mengyu Zhao, Jiaxin Lu, Yanping Yu, Yixiao Niu, Luxiao Zhang, Peijun Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qinqing Wu *Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Lu Ye *Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuwei Wu *Department of General Surgery, Union Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Mengyu Zhao *Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Jiaxin LuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanping YuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yixiao NiuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Luxiao ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Peijun ZuoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is a malignancy with a high mortality rate and complex biological characteristics and heterogeneity, which poses challenges for clinical treatment. Anoikis is a type of programmed cell death that occurs when cells lose their attachment to the extracellular matrix (ECM), and it plays a crucial role in tumor metastasis. However, the specific biological link between anoikis and COAD, as well as its mechanisms in tumor progression, remains unclear, making it a potential new direction for therapeutic strategy research. Methods: We employed transcriptomic data and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to pinpoint differentially expressed anoikis-related genes (ARGs) in COAD. Using Cox proportional hazards models and Lasso regression analysis, we developed a prognostic signature derived from these ARGs. We also investigated the roles and interactions of these genes in the tumor microenvironment by analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing data. Additionally, we employed molecular docking techniques to evaluate the potential of inhibin subunit beta B (INHBB) as therapeutic targets and to assess the binding affinity of candidate drugs. Finally, we used gene knockout techniques to silence the key gene INHBB and explored its biological functions Results: In our study, by analyzing the expression differences of ARGs, we successfully classified patients with COAD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with elevated risk scores experienced poorer prognosis, a finding that was confirmed in both the training and validation cohorts. Additionally, immune infiltration analysis revealed a notable increase in immune cell presence within the tumor microenvironment of high-risk patients. Molecular docking identified potential drug candidates with high binding affinity to INHBB, including risperidone. Furthermore, Conclusion: In summary, our research, based on the expression characteristics of ARGs, provides new insights into the precise classification, prognosis assessment, and identification of potential therapeutic targets in COAD. It also validates the key role of INHBB in the progression of COAD, establishing the foundation for future personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColonic NeoplasmsInhibin-beta SubunitsMolecular Docking SimulationBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMalePrognosisSingle-Cell AnalysisTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorInhibin-beta Subunitsanoikiscolon adenocarcinomaINHBB 1molecular dockingsingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID39850875
PMCPMC11754261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.