ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Impact of crop commercialization on multidimensional poverty in rural Ethiopia: propensity score approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reducing poverty through crop commercialization is one of the antipoverty efforts that helps promote health. This study explored the prevalence and the causal relationship between crop commercialization and rural Ethiopian households' multidimensional poverty using multilevel data. Methods: The study uses data from the most recent nationally representative Ethiopian socioeconomic survey 2018/19 to calculate the rural multidimensional poverty index using the Alkire and Foster technique. The data show 2,714 rural households nested in 59 administrative zones of Ethiopia. Based on several parameters (nutrition and health, education, living standards, rural livelihoods and resources, and risk), the investigation looks into the multidimensional poverty levels of Ethiopian rural households and how they differ across Ethiopian administrative zones. Results: The results indicate that 47.8% of the rural households of Ethiopians were multidimensionally poor in several dimensions; nutrition and health, education, living standards, rural livelihoods and resources, and risk. The living standard dimension is most deprivation-prone for the rural, multidimensional poor households. In addition, multidimensional poverty is more prevalent in Somali and Afar region rural areas. The best linear unbiased prediction estimates of multidimensional poverty vary substantially across Ethiopia's administrative zones. Specifically, the top poorest performing administrative zones concerning the likelihood of being multidimensional poor among rural households were Shebelle, Zone 2, Zone 3, Zone 4, and Konso special woreda. Conclusion: The results of the generalized linear mixed-effects model show that crop-commercialized households have reduced the odds of being multidimensionally poorer than those who did not. This study recommends policymakers focus on rural mumyltidimensional poverty reduction strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.