ArticleERJ open research2025
Artificial intelligence improves bronchoscopy performance: a randomised crossover trial.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in bronchoscopy: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Key lessons from AI in other endoscopic disciplines to guide the future in cystoscopy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lymph-Node Detection and Characterization: A Pioneer Multicenter Transatlantic Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Bronchoscopy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and radiomics in drug-induced interstitial lung disease.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- An autonomous bronchoscopy robot controlled by artificial intelligence (BronchoBot) outperforms experienced bronchoscopists in a simulated setting.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of interventional pulmonology in management of pulmonary nodules during lung cancer screening.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Review
- Review
- Contemporary Concise Review 2024: New Techniques in Interventional Pulmonology.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence augmentation raises questions about the future of bronchoscopy.ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: Flexible bronchoscopy is an operator-dependent procedure. An automatic bronchial identification system based on artificial intelligence (AI) could help bronchoscopists to perform more complete and structured procedures through automatic guidance. Methods: 101 participants were included from six different continents at the European Respiratory Society annual conference in Milan, 9-13 September 2023. Participants were split into three groups based on experience: novices (0 bronchoscopies), intermediates (1-249 bronchoscopies) and experienced (≥250 bronchoscopies). The participants performed two bronchoscopies on a realistic physical phantom, one with AI (AmbuBronchoSimulatorTrainingGUIDEv.0.0.1, Prototype version, Ambu) and one Standard procedure. The F1-group received AI guidance for their first procedure, the F2-group for their second. A crossover randomisation controlled for learning by testing. All procedures were automatically rated according to the outcome measures: inspected segments, structured progressions and procedure time. Results: AI guidance caused the participants to inspect more segments (mean difference, paired t-test: +6.0 segments, p<0.001), perform more structured progressions (+5.2 progressions, p<0.001) and spend more time on the procedure (+72 s, p<0.001) compared to their standard procedures. The effects of AI guidance on inspected segments and structured progression were highest for novices but significant for all experience groups: novices (+8.2 segments, p=0.012 and +6.6 progressions, p<0.001), intermediates (+5.7 segments, p=0.006 and +5.1 progressions, p<0.001) and experienced (+4.3 segments, p=0.006 and +3.8 progressions, p<0.016). Conclusions: AI guidance helped bronchoscopists of all experience levels to inspect more segments in a more structured order. Clinical implementation of AI guidance could help ensure and document more complete bronchoscopy procedures in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.