Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850838›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Prevalence of nasopharyngeal bacteria during naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease in commercial stocker cattle.

Afroza Akter, Hannah Teddleton, Marc Caldwell, Gina Pighetti, Phillip R Myer, Madison T Henniger, Liesel Schneider, Elizabeth Shepherd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Afroza AkterDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.
Hannah TeddletonDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-8742-3415
Marc CaldwellDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences/College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1451-9749
Gina PighettiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.
Phillip R MyerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1980-2105
Madison T HennigerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7739-8932
Liesel SchneiderDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.
Elizabeth ShepherdDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN-Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-4153-2774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is one of the most common economic and health challenges to the beef cattle industry. Prophylactic use of antimicrobial drugs can alter the microbial communities in the respiratory tract. Considering that the bovine upper respiratory tract microbiome has been associated with generalized health, understanding the microenvironment that influences this microbiome may provide insights into the pathogenesis of BRD. This study aimed to determine temporal variation in nasopharyngeal (NP) microbiome in naturally occurring BRD in newly received stocker calves. Mixed breed steers (

Indexed as

BacteriaBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattle DiseasesMicrobiotaNasopharynxAnimalsCattleMalePrevalenceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBovine respiratory diseaseNasopharyngeal microbesStocker cattle

Identifiers

PMID39850838
PMCPMC11756368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.