Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850836›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2025

Insights in biomarkers complexity and routine clinical practice for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules and cancer.

Maria de Lurdes Godinho de Matos, Mafalda Pinto, Ana Gonçalves, Sule Canberk, Maria João Martins Bugalho, Paula Soares

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria de Lurdes Godinho de MatosDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Hospital Curry Cabral, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mafalda PintoInstituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto (IPATIMUP), i3S-Institute for Research & Innovation in Health, Porto, Portugal.
Ana GonçalvesDepartment of Pathology, Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Porto, Portugal.
Sule CanberkInstituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto (IPATIMUP), i3S-Institute for Research & Innovation in Health, Porto, Portugal.
Maria João Martins BugalhoDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria; Medical Faculty, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula SoaresInstituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto (IPATIMUP), i3S-Institute for Research & Innovation in Health, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-6998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant thyroid nodules continues to be a major challenge in clinical practice. The rising incidence of thyroid neoplasm and the low incidence of aggressive thyroid carcinoma, urges the exploration of strategies to improve the diagnostic accuracy in a pre-surgical phase, particularly for indeterminate nodules, and to prevent unnecessary surgeries. Only in 2022, the 5th WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors, and in 2023, the 3rd Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and the European Thyroid Association included biomarkers in their guidelines. In this review, we discuss the integration of biomarkers within the routine clinical practice for diagnosis of thyroid nodules and cancer. Methodology: The literature search for this review was performed through Pub Med, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. We selected 156 publications with significant contributions to this topic, with the majority (86, or 55.1%) published between January 2019 and March 2024, including some publications from our group during those periods. The inclusion criteria were based on articles published in recognized scientific journals with high contributions to the proposed topic. We excluded articles not emphasizing molecular biomarkers in refine the pre-surgical diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Results: We explored genetic biomarkers, considering the division of thyroid neoplasm into Conclusions: The knowledge of genetic and molecular biomarkers has achieved a high level of complexity, and the difficulties related to its applicability determine that their implementation in clinical practice is not yet a reality. More studies with larger series are needed to optimize their use in routine practice. Additionally, the improvement of new techniques, such as liquid biopsy and/or artificial intelligence, may be the future for a better understanding of molecular biomarkers in thyroid nodular disease.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansBiomarkers, Tumor5th WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine TumorsGenetic and miRNAs biomarkersThe 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid CytopathologyThyroid nodules and cancerUltrasound fine-needle aspiration cytology

Identifiers

PMID39850836
PMCPMC11756370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.