Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850825›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Efficacy analysis of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study.

Zhijie Gong, Liping Zhou, Yinghao He, Jun Zhou, Yanjie Deng, Zudong Huang, WeiWei Wang, Qiangbang Yang, Jian Pan, Yingze Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhijie Gong *Second Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Liping Zhou *Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Yinghao HeSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Jun ZhouSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Yanjie DengThe First Clinical College of Medicine, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Zudong HuangSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
WeiWei WangSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Qiangbang YangSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Jian PanSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Yingze LiSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Xiaolu YuanDepartment of Pathology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Minghui MaSecond Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (P-HIPEC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Additionally, it explores how the frequency and timing of P-HIPEC influence treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 227 patients with locally AGC who underwent laparoscopic surgery at Maoming People's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022. Patients were stratified into the HIPEC group (n=101) and the non-HIPEC group (n=126), based on whether they received postoperative P-HIPEC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline characteristics, facilitating a comparative analysis of survival outcomes, postoperative complications and recurrence patterns. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. Furthermore, the impact of varying P-HIPEC frequencies and initiation timings was evaluated. Results: No significant differences in overall survival (OS) or postoperative complication rates were observed between the two groups in the original and PSM cohorts. But the disease-free survival (DFS) of the HIPEC group was significantly higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (HR 0.569; 95% CI 0.362-0.894; Conclusion: P-HIPEC effectively reduces the risk of postoperative PM and improves DFS in patients with locally AGC without increasing postoperative complications. However, it does not significantly impact OS. Additionally, variations in the frequency and timing of P-HIPEC initiation do not significantly affect survival outcomes, postoperative complications, or recurrence patterns.

Indexed as

gastric cancerlocally advancedperitoneal metastasisprognosisprophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39850825
PMCPMC11754059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.