ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Sex differences in atrial potential morphology.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Men and women's hearts don't beat the same: Epicardial mapping of Bachmann's bundle.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Individuals at High Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Primary Care Community Cohort Study, 2015-2024.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Areas of conduction disorders play an important role in both initiation and perpetuation of AF and can be recognized by specific changes in unipolar potential morphology. For example, EGM fractionation may be caused by asynchronous activation of adjacent cardiomyocytes because of structural barriers such as fibrotic strands. However, it is unknown whether there are sex differences in unipolar potential morphology. Therefore, atrial potential morphologies during sinus rhythm (SR) were compared between male and female patients. Methods: Based on propensity score matching, 62 male and female patients in whom high-resolution mapping of the right atrium (RA), left atrium (LA), and pulmonary vein area (PVA) including Bachmann's bundle (BB) was performed during coronary bypass grafting surgery and/or valvular heart surgery. Unipolar potentials were classified as single potentials (SPs), short double potentials (SDPs), long double potentials (LDP), fractionated potentials (FPs) and fraction duration (FD). The proportion of conduction block lines was also determined. Results: Female patients had a higher proportion of SDPs, LDPs and FPs at the RA, and SDPs at BB. At the PVA, there were less SPs and more SDPs and FPs. In females, FDs were longer at the RA and PVA, and potential voltages of only SPs were lower at the RA (all P < 0.05). Females also had more CB at the RA and at PVA (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In females, the proportion of single unipolar potentials indicative of smooth conduction, was lower compared to males, at the RA and PVA and to a lesser degree at BB. Females also had more CB at RA and PVA. Hence, these results may reflect sex-differences in the degree of electrical remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.