ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Fully automated coronary artery calcium score and risk categorization from chest CT using deep learning and multiorgan segmentation: A validation study from National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Implementation of Artificial Intelligence: Fully Automated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Automated opportunistic cardiovascular risk assessment in non-small cell lung cancer patients on routine chest CT using an optimised nnU-net framework.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Machine learning in cancer imaging for enhanced precision in diagnosis and therapy.Discover computing · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the impact of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation exercise training on cardiopulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated by unstable angina pectoris using a hierarchical deep learning CT image model.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Anatomically Guided Cascaded U-Net Ensemble for Coronary Artery Calcification Segmentation in Cardiac CT.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimized Lightweight Architecture for Coronary Artery Disease Classification in Medical Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Imaging Characterisation of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review on Current Classifications and New Insights Brought by Artificial Intelligence.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) has shown that screening with low dose CT in high-risk population was associated with reduction in lung cancer mortality. These patients are also at high risk of coronary artery disease, and we used deep learning model to automatically detect, quantify and perform risk categorisation of coronary artery calcification score (CACS) from non-ECG gated Chest CT scans. Materials and methods: Automated calcium quantification was performed using a neural network based on Mask regions with convolutional neural networks (R-CNN) for multiorgan segmentation. Manual evaluation of calcium was carried out using proprietary software. This study used 80 patients to train the segmentation model and randomly selected 1442 patients were used for the validation of the algorithm. We compared the model generated results with Ground Truth. Results: Automatic cardiac and aortic segmentation model worked well (Mean Dice score: 0.91). Cohen's kappa coefficient between the reference actual and the interclass computed predictive categories on the test set is 0.72 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.83). Our method correctly classifies the risk group in 78.8 % of the cases and classifies the subjects in the same group. F-score is measured as 0.78; 0.71; 0.81; 0.82; 0.92 in calcium score categories 0(CS:0), I (1-99), II (100-400), III (400-1000), IV (>1000), respectively. 79 % of the predictive scores lie in the same categories, 20 % of the predictive scores are one category up or down, and only 1.2 % patients were more than one category off. For the presence/absence of coronary artery calcifications, our deep learning model achieved a sensitivity of 90 % and a specificity of 94 %. Conclusion: Fully automated model shows good correlation compared with reference standards. Automating the process could improve diagnostic ability, risk categorization, facilitate primary prevention intervention, improve morbidity and mortality, and decrease healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.