Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850777›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025

Fully automated coronary artery calcium score and risk categorization from chest CT using deep learning and multiorgan segmentation: A validation study from National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).

Sudhir Rathore, Ashish Gautam, Prashant Raghav, Vijay Subramaniam, Vikash Gupta, Maanya Rathore, Ananmay Rathore, Samir Rathore, Srikanth Iyengar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sudhir RathoreDepartment of Cardiology, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, Surrey, UK.
Ashish GautamKardioLabs AI, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Prashant RaghavKardioLabs AI, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Vijay SubramaniamResearch Associate, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Vikash GuptaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Maanya RathoreMedical Student, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Ananmay RathoreMedical Student, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Samir RathoreKardioLabs AI, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Srikanth IyengarDepartment of Radiology, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, Surrey, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) has shown that screening with low dose CT in high-risk population was associated with reduction in lung cancer mortality. These patients are also at high risk of coronary artery disease, and we used deep learning model to automatically detect, quantify and perform risk categorisation of coronary artery calcification score (CACS) from non-ECG gated Chest CT scans. Materials and methods: Automated calcium quantification was performed using a neural network based on Mask regions with convolutional neural networks (R-CNN) for multiorgan segmentation. Manual evaluation of calcium was carried out using proprietary software. This study used 80 patients to train the segmentation model and randomly selected 1442 patients were used for the validation of the algorithm. We compared the model generated results with Ground Truth. Results: Automatic cardiac and aortic segmentation model worked well (Mean Dice score: 0.91). Cohen's kappa coefficient between the reference actual and the interclass computed predictive categories on the test set is 0.72 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.83). Our method correctly classifies the risk group in 78.8 % of the cases and classifies the subjects in the same group. F-score is measured as 0.78; 0.71; 0.81; 0.82; 0.92 in calcium score categories 0(CS:0), I (1-99), II (100-400), III (400-1000), IV (>1000), respectively. 79 % of the predictive scores lie in the same categories, 20 % of the predictive scores are one category up or down, and only 1.2 % patients were more than one category off. For the presence/absence of coronary artery calcifications, our deep learning model achieved a sensitivity of 90 % and a specificity of 94 %. Conclusion: Fully automated model shows good correlation compared with reference standards. Automating the process could improve diagnostic ability, risk categorization, facilitate primary prevention intervention, improve morbidity and mortality, and decrease healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChest CTCoronary artery calcium scoreCoronary artery diseaseRisk categorization

Identifiers

PMID39850777
PMCPMC11754490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.