ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2025
Benefits, problems, and optimal timing of administration of indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indocyanine green fluorescence navigation for extrahepatic bile duct visualization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- White paper: robotic cholecystectomy-new technology but safe principles still apply.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Review
- Short-interval intravenous indocyanine green administration in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective evaluation of visualization and safety.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Observational
- Technological Advances in Pre-Operative Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The advantages of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography have been emphasized, but its disadvantages remain unclear. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this modality, particularly the optimal timing of administration of ICG fluorescence. Design: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient data. Setting: Data were gathered from a single institution. Participants: 69 patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were included. Interventions: We administered intravenous ICG injections at three different times: preoperatively (5 mg/body weight (BW), 15 min before incision), morning of the surgery (12.5 mg/BW 4 hours before surgery), and on the day before the surgery (25 mg/BW, 20 hours before surgery). The PINPOINT or SPY-PHI (Stryker) systems were used for fluorescence imaging. Main outcome measures: The course of the common bile and cystic ducts was identified using fluorescence imaging. The visualization quality was graded on a three-point scale: good, poor, and unobservable. Results: There were 17 patients for preoperative administration, 14 on the morning of the surgery, and 38 on the day before the surgery. The cystic duct could not be visualized in five patients because of insufficient dose, impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, after endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), and severe cholecystitis. The observations were poor in 14 patients. The reasons for the poor visualization were cholecystitis after ERBD and a low signal-to-noise ratio due to intense light emission from the liver, which is a characteristic of preoperative administration. Conclusion: The cystic and common bile ducts were well visualized using ICG fluorescence cholangiography, except in patients with impacted gallstones, cystic duct stones, ERBD, and severe cholecystitis. The most effective timing for ICG administration was the day before the surgery. ICG fluorescence cholangiography is not a substitute for intraoperative cholangiography or preoperative biliary imaging; however, it would be desirable in all patients who undergo cholecystectomy. Trial registration number: jRCTs041180006.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.