Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850727›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Lateralisation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty - A narrative review.

Kapil Kumar, Devansh Goyal

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kapil KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, AB15 6XS, UK.
Devansh GoyalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, AB15 6XS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has witnessed a significant advancement with the introduction of lateralisation techniques, aiming to enhance shoulder function and implant durability. Traditional medialised designs, following Grammont's principles, have encountered challenges such as scapular notching, reduced rotational strength, and instability. In contrast, lateralisation methods, which reposition the joint center of rotation laterally on the glenoid, humerus, or both, seek to improve deltoid leverage, optimize the rotator cuff muscles' length-tension relationship, and enhance joint stability. Strategies for achieving lateralisation include bone grafts, lateralised glenosphere designs, and metallic augmented base plates. Clinical and biomechanical studies have shown that lateralised RSA designs decrease scapular notching, enhance range of motion, and promote stability. However, these advantages come with drawbacks like heightened shear forces, potential acromial stress fractures, and the risk of joint overstuffing. The future of RSA involves striking a balance between these aspects through tailored implant configurations and the utilization of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, 3D modeling, and augmented reality to optimize surgical results. Further research is imperative to validate the long-term efficacy of lateralised RSA and refine these novel approaches to shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

BIO-RSACombined lateralisationImplant designLateralisationNotchingReverse shoulder arthroplastyShoulder replacement

Identifiers

PMID39850727
PMCPMC11751540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.