ArticleOncology letters2025
Claudin 18.2: An attractive marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The prognostic value of CLDN18.2 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Pooled it
- Expression of Claudin-18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Intratumoral Expression of Claudin 18.2 in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Claudin-18.2: Molecular mechanisms to clinical translation in solid tumors (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Article
- Concordance of claudin-18.2 expression in biopsy, resection, and recurrent specimens: implications for zolbetuximab therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Tissue barriers · 2026Article
- Claudin-18.2 immunohistochemical evaluation in pancreatic cancer specimens: review and recommendations for routine testing and scoring.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a highly aggressive tumor with limited treatment options. Zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against the tight junction protein Claudin 18.2 has recently been developed. At present, few and conflicting data have been reported regarding the clinical-pathological features of Claudin 18.2 expression in PDA. The present study investigated the expression of Claudin 18.2 in histological samples from PDA patients with the aim of verifying its utility as a therapeutic biomarker. Claudin 18.2 immunoreactivity was assessed by immunohistochemical staining on 70 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded PDA specimens (28 surgical specimens and 42 fine needle aspiration biopsies). The results obtained were associated with the clinicopathological characteristics and the survival rate of patients. Claudin 18.2 was detected only in neoplastic cells, not in normal pancreatic tissue. Claudin 18.2 was positive in 50% of samples and a higher expression was associated with well- and moderately-differentiated tumors and lymph node-negative status. The high expression of Claudin 18.2 in neoplastic tissue and absence in normal cells suggested that this protein had an attractive role in PDA as both a diagnostic and a prognostic-therapeutic marker. High expression of Claudin 18.2 in neoplastic tissue was associated with more favorable prognostic parameters and the high percentage of positive samples obtained suggests that Zolbetuximab may be suitable for a large number of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.