ArticleJB & JS open access
Functional Improvements by Controlled Suture Tension in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of modified Kessler tension-reducing suturing combined with double-row repair for Patte II-III rotator cuff tears.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although a certain degree of tension in bridging sutures is required for proper tendon healing following suture-bridge rotator cuff repair, excessive suture tension may be detrimental to tendon healing. This study aimed to investigate the effects of bridging suture tension on clinical outcomes and tendon healing. We hypothesized that fixed, low tension of the bridging sutures would improve the tendon healing rate and clinical outcomes compared with maximum manual tensioning. Methods: A group of 39 patients with a rotator cuff tear were treated with arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair, in which the bridging sutures were uniformly tensioned to 20 N (group A). A separate group of 37 patients was treated with the same suture construct, but the sutures were tensioned by maximum manual pulling (mean tension, 36.1 N; group B). The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, active anterior elevation, external and internal rotation, and Constant score were compared between the groups preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Anatomical healing was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1 year after surgery. Results: At 6 months postoperatively, all clinical values had improved in both groups. The Constant score (p < 0.001), VAS pain score (p < 0.001), and anterior elevation (p = 0.004) were significantly better in group A than in group B. Two years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between groups A and B in the Constant score (p = 0.847), VAS pain score (p = 0.991), and anterior elevation (p = 0.855). Group A demonstrated a significantly lower retear rate (3 of 39, 7.7%) than group B (9 of 37, 24.3%) (p = 0.0467). Conclusions: Double-row suture-bridge repairs with fixed, low tension led to superior clinical outcomes at 6 months and a superior tendon healing rate at 1 year compared with repairs with higher suture tension. However, the clinical outcomes did not differ significantly at 2 years between the 2 tensioning methods. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.