ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
No correlation between thrombin generation and emicizumab levels: implications for monitoring emicizumab therapy.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intrinsic activated thrombin generation for treatment efficacy and monitoring of octocog alfa and emicizumab in severe hemophilia A.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics factor (F)VIII, has significantly improved hemophilia A management. Although emicizumab levels can be measured, tools for estimating the hemostatic efficacy of emicizumab are lacking. Thrombin generation (TG) assays can distinguish bleeding phenotypes in persons with hemophilia A on FVIII prophylaxis and may also be used during emicizumab therapy. Objectives: To assess the association between TG parameters, emicizumab levels, and bleeding in patients on emicizumab therapy. Methods: A single-center longitudinal cohort study was conducted, with samples collected during the steady-state phase of emicizumab therapy. TG was measured using tissue factor (TF; TF-TG, 1 pM) and FXIa (FXIa-TG, 200 pM). Emicizumab concentrations were determined with mass spectrometry. Only treated bleeds were recorded. Pearson correlations (rho, Results: Eighty-five samples from 49 patients were analyzed during a median of 1 year of emicizumab therapy. Most bleeds were traumatic (97%; Conclusion: TG parameters showed no clinically relevant correlations with emicizumab plasma concentrations, were not associated with traumatic bleeding, and showed considerable intrapatient variability. Therefore, TG was not considered useful for monitoring coagulation potential in patients on steady-state emicizumab prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.