Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850533›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Recent Advancements in Robotic-assisted Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Kazuho Kawashima, Shadi Ghali, Dariush Nikkhah, Ali Esmaeili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kazuho KawashimaFrom the Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.
Shadi GhaliDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Dariush NikkhahDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ali EsmaeiliDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There has been a delayed, yet steady uptake of robotic-assisted surgery over the past decade within the field of plastic surgery. In an era of rapidly evolving scientific and technological development, there is a need for an update on the current literature for robotic-assisted plastic surgery procedures. Methods: Searches were conducted across major databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Central for published literature from March 2023 to December 2024. Only published articles written in English with full texts were considered for the final narrative synthesis. Results: Initially, we identified 1200 articles in the database search. Subsequently, 46 articles were included in our final narrative synthesis. Among the selected studies, 4 focused on reconstruction in transoral robotic surgery, 14 on breast surgery, 10 on robotic microsurgery, 5 on abdominal wall reconstruction, 6 on vaginoplasty, and 5 on flap harvest. Conclusions: The evidence to support the advantage of robotic plastic surgery procedures over traditional methods is relatively weak. However, there have been some advancements, specifically in transoral robotic surgery, robotic mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Nevertheless, comprehensive exploration and prospective randomized trials are essential across all procedures to define the role of surgical robots in plastic surgery. The impediments to wider adoption include high costs, disruption to operative flow, and the absence of haptic feedback in robotic-assisted procedures within the specialty.

Identifiers

PMID39850533
PMCPMC11756886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.