Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850447›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024

Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness: a dose-response shear-wave elastography study.

Sara Kranjc, Mojca Fink, Masatoshi Nakamura, Žiga Kozinc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara KranjcFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.
Mojca FinkFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.
Masatoshi NakamuraFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nishi Kyushu University, Kanzaki, Saga, Japan.
Žiga KozincFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching is widely used to increase range of motion, but its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This experimental, parallel group design study investigated the acute effects of PNF stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness and explored a potential dose-response relationship. Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (23 females, 7 males) were randomly assigned to either a PNF stretching group (n = 15; 22.96 ± 2.2 years) or a control group (n = 15; 23.3 ± 2.1 years). Rectus femoris stiffness was measured using shear-wave elastography (Resona 7, Mindray, China) at two locations (distal and proximal) before and after the second, fourth, and sixth sets of PNF stretching. The protocol involved six sets, each with three 10-s stretches and 5-s maximal contractions. Results: The results indicate that PNF stretching had no statistically significant effect on muscle stiffness, with no main effects of group (F = 0.05; Discussion: These findings highlight a location-specific difference in muscle stiffness that was unaffected by the intervention. In conclusion, PNF stretching did not acutely reduce rectus femoris stiffness compared to passive rest, regardless of the number of stretching sets performed. Further research is needed to understand the muscle-specific effects of PNF stretching.

Indexed as

acute effectsdose-responsemuscle elasticitystretching interventionultrasound elastography

Identifiers

PMID39850447
PMCPMC11754182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.