Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850401›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024

A safe and effective treatment for refractory malignant ascites: the use of pigtail catheters.

Akif Doğan, Ömer Aydıner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akif DoğanŞehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Sancaktepe, Turkey.
Ömer AydınerDr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Kartal, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recurrent malignant ascites is a common and challenging condition in cancer patients, often lacking a standardized treatment protocol. Small-scale studies in the literature have been insufficient to establish a treatment standard. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of pigtail peritoneal catheter application in the treatment of malignant ascites. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had pigtail catheters inserted between January 2017 and December 2022. The study focused on the success rate of the procedure, catheter dwell time, complication rates, and the factors influencing these outcomes. Results: A total of 196 patients, 102 of whom were female, with malignant ascites were included in the study. The median age was 65.5 years. The procedure had a 100% success rate, with no procedure-related deaths or major complications. The overall minor complication rate, including bleeding, minor cellulitis, leakage, and blockage, was 52%. Patients with comorbidities experienced statistically significantly more complications ( Conclusions: Pigtail peritoneal catheters provide effective and safe minimally invasive fluid drainage for the treatment of malignant ascites. The most critical factors for preventing procedure-related complications and ensuring procedural success include proper indication, correct timing, procedural expertise, and the involvement of well-trained patients and caregivers.

Indexed as

end-stage cancermalignant ascitespigtail catheters

Identifiers

PMID39850401
PMCPMC11756362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.