Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850383›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Enhanced recovery in type A aortic dissection evaluating the efficacy and feasibility of early myocardial reperfusion.

Tianyu Niu, Zhishuo Liu, Yu Liu, Zhonglu Yang, Yuguang Ge, Lu Wang, Lin Xia, Hui Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianyu Niu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Zhishuo Liu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Zhonglu YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Yuguang GeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Lin XiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Hui JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the feasibility and early outcomes of early myocardial reperfusion in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD), evaluating its effectiveness and potential benefits compared to traditional cardioplegic arrest techniques. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 168 patients diagnosed with TAAD who underwent surgery at the General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command in China from January 2021 to July 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: early myocardial reperfusion (EMR group, Results: Early myocardial reperfusion significantly reduced ventilation time 23.08 (18.21, 66.74) hours vs. 48.58 (19.18, 122.97) hours, Conclusion: This study demonstrates that early myocardial reperfusion is a feasible and effective technique for TAAD, offering considerable advantages in reducing ventilation time, ICU stay, hospitalization duration and postoperative renal insufficiency.

Indexed as

cardioplegic arrestcardiovascular surgeryearly myocardial reperfusionperioperative outcomestype A aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID39850383
PMCPMC11754212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.