ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Development and validation of a prediction model for coronary heart disease risk in depressed patients aged 20 years and older using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing clinically cardiovascular machine learning model for risk prediction via sample augmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Novel biomarkers of the Framingham risk score in patients with depression: A cross-sectional study.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted organoid construction in congenital heart disease: current applications and future prospects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is being increasingly acknowledged as an important risk factor contributing to coronary heart disease (CHD). Currently, there is no predictive model specifically designed to evaluate the risk of coronary heart disease among individuals with depression. We aim to develop a machine learning (ML) model that will analyze risk factors and forecast the probability of coronary heart disease in individuals suffering from depression. Methods: This research employed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007-2018, which included 2,085 individuals who had previously been diagnosed with depression. The population was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set, with an 8:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent risk factors for coronary heart disease in individuals with depression. Eight machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set to construct the model, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), classification and regression tree (CART), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and neural network (NNET). The validation set are used to evaluate the various performances of eight machine learning models. Several evaluation metrics were employed to assess and compare the performance of eight different machine learning models, aiming to identify the most effective algorithm for predicting coronary heart disease risk in individuals with depression. The evaluation metrics applied in this study included the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, Brier scores, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the precision-recall (PR) curve. And internally validated by the bootstrap method. Results: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified age, chest pain status, history of myocardial infarction, serum triglyceride levels, and education level as independent predictors of coronary heart disease risk. Eight machine learning algorithms are applied to construct the models, among which the Random Forest model has the best performance, with an (Area Under Curve) AUC of 0.987 for the random forest model in the training set, and an AUC of 0.848 for the PR curve. In the validation set, the random forest model achieves an AUC of 0.996, and an AUC of 0.960 for the PR curve, which demonstrates an excellent discriminative ability. Calibration curves indicated high congruence between observed and predicted odds, with minimal Brier scores of 0.026 and 0.021 for the training, respectively, reinforcing the model's ability to discriminate. Set and validation set, respectively, reinforcing the model's predictive accuracy. DCA curves confirmed net benefits of the random forest model across. Furthermore, the AUC of the random forest model was 0.928 after internal validation by bootstrap method, indicating that its discriminative ability is good, and the model is useful for clinical assessment of the risk of coronary heart disease in depressed people. Conclusion: The random forest algorithm exhibited the best predictive performance, potentially aiding clinicians in assessing the risk probabilities of coronary heart disease within this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.