Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850346›Full record

ArticleArchivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular

[Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic profile of patients with left intraventricular thrombus in three high-complexity centers during the period 2000-2022].

Felipe Lozano Pineda, Carolina Cardona Buitrago, Santiago Giraldo Ramírez, Jairo Alfonso Gándara Ricardo, Edison Muñoz Ortiz, Catalina Gallego Muñoz, Juan David Valencia Duque, Edgar Alonso Mejía Guerra, Juan Nicolás Dallos Ferrerosa, Juan Manuel Senior Sánchez

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felipe Lozano PinedaDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Sección de Cardiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia Departamento de Medicina Interna Sección de Cardiología Clínica Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3498-3116
Carolina Cardona BuitragoDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Sección de Cardiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia Departamento de Medicina Interna Sección de Cardiología Clínica Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-509X
Santiago Giraldo RamírezUnidad de Cardiología Clínica, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe; Medellín, Colombia. Unidad de Cardiología Clínica Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-7778
Jairo Alfonso Gándara RicardoDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Sección de Cardiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia Departamento de Medicina Interna Sección de Cardiología Clínica Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-0033
Edison Muñoz OrtizDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Sección de Cardiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia Departamento de Medicina Interna Sección de Cardiología Clínica Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-7985
Catalina Gallego MuñozUnidad de Cardiología Clínica, Clínica Cardio VID; Medellín, Colombia. Unidad de Cardiología Clínica Clínica Cardio VID Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3636-4346
Juan David Valencia DuqueUnidad de Cardiología Clínica, Clínica Cardio VID; Medellín, Colombia. Unidad de Cardiología Clínica Clínica Cardio VID Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0749-8506
Edgar Alonso Mejía GuerraFundación Universitaria San Martín; Medellín, Colombia. Fundación Universitaria San Martín Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5257-2139
Juan Nicolás Dallos FerrerosaDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Sección de Cardiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia Departamento de Medicina Interna Sección de Cardiología Clínica Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-5526
Juan Manuel Senior SánchezDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Sección de Cardiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia Departamento de Medicina Interna Sección de Cardiología Clínica Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8312-7194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic profile of patients with left intraventricular thrombus (LVT) in three high-complexity centers in Medellín, Colombia, between January 2000 and January 2022. Materials and methods: This was an observational and cross-sectional study that included 307 patients with LVT. Hospital records were analyzed to identify the clinical and therapeutic profile, and thrombus resolution and systemic embolism were evaluated. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test and a logistic regression model. Results: The prevalence of LVT was 9.75%. In 85% of cases, LVT was diagnosed using transthoracic echocardiography; 75.9% of patients were male, and the median age was 62 years. The most frequent comorbidities were heart failure (95.77%) and hypertension (69.7%).LVT occurred in 27% of cases in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was administered in 78.5% of cases, and warfarin was the most commonly used anticoagulant (82.7%). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 19.2%, mainly gastrointestinal, and 35% of patients achieved thrombus resolution. Systemic embolism developed in 30% of cases, primarily affecting the central nervous system. Overall mortality was 15%. Conclusions: The prevalence of LVT was 9.75%. Warfarin remains the standard treatment, although alternative therapies are used in special cases. Apical dysfunction was associated with systemic embolism.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsEmbolism and ThrombosisEpidemiologyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39850346
PMCPMC11753417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.