ArticleTranslational neuroscience2025
Analysis of gradual diameter thrombectomy stent
Article in Translational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of gradient thrombectomy stent Methods: The cerebrovascular fluid circulation model was made and fixed on the test table. About 0.9% sodium chloride injection was injected to the vascular model through a miniature water pump to circulate it. Four kinds of thrombus products containing different red blood cell (RBC) volumes of 0, 5, 40, and 80% were placed at the target location as thrombus. Each type of thrombus was removed five times using SOLITAIRE stent and gradient thrombectomy stent. The thrombectomy effects were observed by comparison of the two types of stents. Results: Thrombus containing 80% volume of RBC escaped thrombus fragments during thrombectomy with both stents. Thrombus containing 0% volume of RBC (rich in fibrin) had poor chimerism with stents. In the thrombus containing 0% RBC volume, there was no statistically significant difference between the two stents ( Conclusion: The gradient thrombectomy stent is as effective as the currently used thrombectomy stent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.