Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850336›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Acute beneficial effects of a functional energy shot on cognitive performance and mood states during cognitively demanding task performance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

Olivia K O'Shea, Nathan Lawley, Anna Azzopardi, Allison Gutkowski, Michelle Murphy Niedziela, Rachel Horn, David O Kennedy, Jason Adamson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06384586 (Investigation of Dietary Supplement Liquid Shot Products on Mental Energy, Cognition), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06384586 nacompletednot on this map

Investigation of Dietary Supplement Liquid Shot Products on Mental Energy, Cognition (Acuity),and Mood

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Water Street CollectiveRan2022 to 2022Enrolled45ConditionsCognition, Mental Fatigue, MoodArmsPlacebo shot, Functional energy shot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olivia K O'SheaResearch and Development, The Water Street Collective, London, United Kingdom.
Nathan LawleyResearch and Development, British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Southampton, United Kingdom.
Anna AzzopardiResearch and Development, British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Southampton, United Kingdom.
Allison GutkowskiHCD Research, Flemington, NJ, United States.
Michelle Murphy NiedzielaHCD Research, Flemington, NJ, United States.
Rachel HornHCD Research, Flemington, NJ, United States.
David O KennedyBrain, Performance, Nutrition Research Centre, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jason AdamsonResearch and Development, British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Functional beverages are increasingly popular but it is important to validate their purported effects through research. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of a new functional energy shot on cognitive performance and mood states in healthy adults, with a focus on measuring mental energy enhancement and attenuation of negative effects associated with extended performance of mentally demanding tasks. Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Thirty-seven healthy males and females, aged 18-30 years, consumed a functional energy shot (Ryde: Energize) or placebo on separate testing occasions one-week apart. Participants completed cognitive and mood assessments pre-dose, and then 30 minutes post-dose over the course of approximately 2 hours. The functional energy shot contained caffeine, ginseng, vitamins and taurine, while the placebo shot was matched for flavor but did not contain these additional ingredients. Results: Use of the functional energy shot was associated with significant improvements over placebo in cognitive performance, as measured by the Cognitive Demand Battery, with enhanced global performance, task-specific accuracy and speed across repeated assessments. Additionally, the shot mitigated negative effects associated with extended cognitive tasks, reducing perceived mental fatigue and increasing perceived alertness and energy. Working memory tasks showed faster performance post-consumption, and mood assessments revealed positive effects on vigor, fatigue and overall mood disturbance. Discussion: These results indicate wide cognitive and mood effects of this functional energy shot, potentially attributable to synergistic combination of active ingredients. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06384586.

Indexed as

cognitionenergymoodperformancesupplementtrial

Identifiers

PMID39850336
PMCPMC11754061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.