ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Development of a vegetation canopy reflectance sensor and its diurnal applicability under clear sky conditions.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spectral reflectance provides valuable information regarding vegetation growth and plays an important role in agriculture, forestry, and grassland management. In this study, a small, portable vegetation canopy reflectance (VCR) sensor that can operate throughout the day was developed. The sensor includes two optical bands at 710 nm and 870 nm, with the light separated by filters, and has a field of view of 28°. It is powered by two 14500 rechargeable batteries and uses Wi-Fi for data transmission. The calibration of the sensor was performed using an integrating sphere, and a solar altitude correction model was constructed. The sensor's accuracy was validated using a standard reflectance gray scale board. The results indicate that the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) at 710 nm were 1.07% and 0.63%, respectively, while those at 870 nm were 0.94% and 0.50%, respectively. Vegetation at 14 sites was measured using both the VCR sensor and an Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD) spectroradiometer at nearly the same time for each site. The results show that the reflectance values measured by both devices were closely aligned. Measurements of Bermuda grass vegetation on clear days revealed that the intra-day reflectance range at 710 nm narrowed from 12.3-19.2% before solar altitude correction to 11.1-13.4% after correction, and the coefficient of variation (CV) decreased from 10.86% to 2.93%. Similarly, at 870 nm, the intra-day reflectance range decreased from 41.6-60.3% to 39.0-42.0%, and the CV decreased from 9.69% to 1.53%. In summary, this study offers a fundamental tool for monitoring vegetation canopy reflectance in the field, which is crucial for advancing high-quality agricultural, grassland, and forest management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.