ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating Infertility Through Diagnostic Hysterolaparoscopy: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Infertility affects a significant proportion of reproductive-age couples globally, with diverse causes. Diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy (DHL) is emerging as a preferred diagnostic tool for evaluating infertility, combining laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for comprehensive assessment. Objective The primary objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of DHL in identifying the causes of infertility in women. Secondary objectives included assessing complication rates associated with the procedure and comparing the efficacy of DHL with other diagnostic modalities to determine its relative benefits and safety in clinical practice. Methods Fifty female patients (ages 20-40 years) experiencing primary or secondary infertility were enrolled from the Outpatient Department of the tertiary care center. Patients were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed consent was obtained, and detailed medical histories were recorded. All participants underwent DHL, assessing uterine, tubal, and ovarian factors contributing to infertility. Results Of the 50 patients, 36 (72%) had primary infertility and 14 (28%) had secondary infertility. The predominant age group for primary infertility was 26-30 years (16 patients, 44.4%), while secondary infertility was most common in the 31-35 age group (7 patients, 50%). Tubal factors accounted for 18 cases (36%), while ovarian issues were identified in 15 cases (29.8%). Uterine factors were found in five cases (11.1% for primary, 7.14% for secondary). DHL also identified uterine pathologies that may lead to pregnancy complications. Conclusions The study underscores the multifactorial nature of infertility, highlighting the importance of DHL in its evaluation. The findings advocate for advanced diagnostic techniques to facilitate targeted treatments and enhance reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.